Home
| YooskTV|
Members
|
Public Figures
|
Features
|
Search
|
Journalists
|
Site Guide - FAQs
|
I'd like to ask
219 people in 86 cities are asking questions to 18 people
Login
Username
Password
Remember me
Forgot your password?
Answer
Question
Brendan Barber
, Given that union membership could be regarded as placing a tax on consumers by raising the cost of production, shouldn't all union members in the UK be morally bound *not* to reduce their shopping bills by buying more cheaply produced goods or service from non-unionised businesses in the UK or overseas? It's easy to be moral when it doesn't cost you money, and you can't have it both ways surely?
Asked by
PatNInterupt
on Feb 13 2009 4:12:49 PM
and supported by 25 members
MORE!
Answer
click "play" to view
1 comment
PatNInterupt
at Mar 16 2009 12:00:00 AM
:
So he (unsurprisingly) "rejects the premise" that trade union membership can be a tax on consumers. It's a good job I didn't ask him about the increased level of unemployment brought about by minimum wage laws, otherwise that's another premise firmly established in economics for generations that he would have had to reject too. It seems ignorance of basic economics is a requirement to reach the top in public life these days.
Topics you are talking about:
All Topics
World Affairs
Politics
Business
Local Issues
Environment
Banks
Education
Jobs
Overseas Aid
Poverty
SME's
Pay and Conditions
Investment
Multiculturalism
Retirement
People you are asking:
Gordon Brown
Peter Mandelson
Lord Malloch-Brown
David Miliband
The delegates
Hazel Blears
Theo Paphitis
Brendan Barber
Douglas Alexander
Matthew Taylor
Caroline Flint
James Purnell
John McFall
Barbara Stocking
Gordon Brown
Blog|
Contact Us
|
Answering on Yoosk
|
Start your own Yoosk
|
I-Frame
|
About Us
|
Terms of Service
|
Privacy Policy
|
Widget